I am getting tired of people in positions of power trying to rewrite history, especially history that I saw becoming history with my own two surgically corrected eyes.
On Page 8 of last Friday’s Kokomo Tribune (yes, I still subscribe to the local newspaper, and so should you because you’d miss it if it went away), there appeared an Associated Press report with the local headline “Trump envoy: Ukrainians ‘brought this on themselves’ after aid paused.”
The “person of power” being quoted was “U.S. Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia,” a retired lieutenant general named Keith Kellogg. A quick check confirmed my assumption that he retired from our own armed forces, because for a person supposedly trying to broker a deal between two sovereign nations, he did not sound even-handed in his estimation of the positions of the two combatants.
It all goes back to that imbroglio in the White House back on February 28. Subsequently, you-know-who “paused” military aid to Ukraine and “paused” the sharing of U.S. intelligence with that beleaguered country. Then the United States cut off access to the commercial satellite imagery that gave the Ukrainians a chance to look into the movements of their enemy.
These moves appeared to be intended to cripple one party in this conflict and improve the hand of the other. Not exactly the acts of a good-faith mediator.
The article refers to a shouting match between the president of Ukraine and you-know-who and his live ventriloquist’s dummy, Boy Blunder.
Hold the presses!
My surgically corrected eyes watched that mess in real time and in living color. Yes, there were voices raised, but it wasn’t the president of Ukraine. It was our own twosome “excoriating” (what a wonderful word!) a guy trying save his country from a painfully drawn-out extinction.
All my surgically corrected eyes saw was a blindsided Ukrainian trying to get a word in edgewise between the rants of our own people.
Did he look happy? No. Was his country being trashed? Most definitely.
Lt. Gen. Kellogg’s reaction to the “pauses”? He is quoted as saying that they were already having an impact, and that the Ukrainians “brought it on themselves.” “The best way I can describe it is sort of like hitting a mule with a two-by-four across the nose,” he said. “You got their attention.”
The retired lieutenant general is reminded that the “mule” in question has spent the last three years fighting a war of survival he was expected to lose in three days.
There is a more colorful word in the English language for “mule,” but this is a family newspaper. You can guess who deserves it the most in this instance
It isn’t the guy from Kyiv.
Over the last three years, that guy has thanked the United States profusely for its assistance, including at least one time before a joint session of Congress, where he received a standing ovation from both sides of the aisle. That was back when Republicans still thought democracy was worth saving.
What is his current sin? What deserved a two-by-four across the nose? I suspect it has to do with his standing up for his county’s interests and failing to kiss the ring of you-know-who. It’s hard to kiss a ring when it comes at you, unexpectedly, as part of a cheap diplomatic sucker punch
This whole sorry incident is symptomatic of yet another attempt by this administration to rewrite history – even though we saw the first draft with our own eyes.
We are now told Ukraine started the war. Excuse me. Have we forgotten the two-mile-long column of heavy military equipment lined up on a highway aimed straight at Kyiv? Have we forgotten the little comedian-turned-president who, as the Russians advanced, spurned being evacuated with a courageous “I need ammunition, not a ride”?
The aim currently appears to be to force an ally to a negotiation that confirms the theft by military force of at least 20 percent of its territory, with no security assurances beyond those made in 1994 when Ukraine voluntarily gave up its nuclear weapons (an estimated 1,700 nuclear warheads). They did this as part of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons signed in the aftermath of the Soviet Union’s unlamented dissolution.
And what did they receive in exchange?
Assurances that their independence and sovereignty in their existing borders would be respected.
Assurances to which this country and today’s aggressor state are both signatories.
Now both signatories seem to be reneging. For the United States, it seems to be in the hopes of currying favor with an authoritarian leader who has never made a promise he was not willing to break, as he has shown with depressing regularity.
Ukraine is fighting for its life with its own blood. No American blood is being spilled (think Vietnam, Afghanistan, Syria, and Iraq). Monetary and military assistance instead is a pretty good deal – especially since most of the money is spent buying American equipment and keeping American workers employed.
The next potential dominoes – Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania – are watching closely to see which way to jump, as is Poland and most of Eastern Europe.
Believe your eyes – surgically corrected or not.